...Steven Spielberg, Tony Kushner, and Daniel Day-Lewis' Lincoln is real good. Possibly a you-know-what piece, even. My review at MSN Movies.
« Speaking of Bond films... | Main | Image of the day, 11/8/12 »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Great review, with only one correction: shouldn't "It's his prudent council.." be "counsel"? Or am I just ignorant of that usage of "council"?
Posted by: Grant L | November 07, 2012 at 10:54 AM
No, "council" is used properly, as in "advice" but I guess by writing "It's his prudent council" I could be seen as referring to Seward in relation to Lincoln, but what I'm saying is that Seward's seemingly prudent advice is that Lincoln wait things out.
Posted by: Glenn Kenny | November 07, 2012 at 11:13 AM
I believe that Grant is still correct. "Counsel" is advice or the act of giving advice. "Council" is a group of people who act in an advisory or legislative capacity.
Posted by: Josh Z | November 07, 2012 at 02:06 PM
Thanks. I don't know what else to say. This has been a busy overheated time with a lot of personal concerns that I haven't discussed because I just consider it unseemly. I suppose I have been even more mistake prone than usual. I'm going to leave it at that.
Posted by: Glenn Kenny | November 07, 2012 at 02:34 PM
Isn't "a busy overheated time" redundant?
Posted by: Tom Block | November 07, 2012 at 04:09 PM
What if one is running around in a snowstorm wearing only a t-shirt and gym shorts?
Posted by: Brian Dauth | November 07, 2012 at 05:03 PM
A what? A period piece?
Posted by: James | November 07, 2012 at 06:42 PM
Wot, not one mention of Jackie Earle Haley? For those of us geek enough to know this or that about Confederate Vice Presidents (meaning one), that scene is killah.
Posted by: Tom Carson | November 07, 2012 at 07:38 PM
I saw it last night and cannot agree with you in any respect. It's "Great Moments With Mr. Lincoln: The Movie." And I daresay the automaton at Disneyland that replicates Lincoln is a lot livelier than Daniel Day Lewis.
It's all about how slavery was repealed -- with African-Americans occasionally allowed to slide into the dark-mottled-with-patches-of-light compositions (pretentious and tiresome in the extreme -- as if it were a crime to fully light a shot) Slavery may be over along with Jim Crow but clearly Speilberg got these players from "Rent-a-Negro" as they are nothing more than cardboard.
Sally Field is fine as alwayst, but it was exceedingly hard to resist the temptaton to take a nap during this thing -- cerain to bore high school students draged their by teir history teachers in perpetuity. "White Elephant" Art" precisely as Manny Farber described it -- in all it's puffed-up pseudo-glory.
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | November 08, 2012 at 09:03 AM
Does anyone else get the feeling David Ehrenstein's posts have so many spelling mistakes because he's always choking on his own rage as he types them?
Posted by: billythrilly | November 08, 2012 at 10:11 AM
It's 7:14 and I need another cup of coffee.
As for my "rage" go shove it up Dinesh D'Sousa's flaccid ass.
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | November 08, 2012 at 10:15 AM
My Two Cents
http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2012/11/08/abraham-lincoln-oscar-hunter/
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | November 08, 2012 at 12:16 PM
So many movies have come out recently on Abe Lincoln. I wanted to see one that was actually a sci fi film.
The only thing that interests me about the current film, when compared to the others, is that Johnny Quino actually seems to have gotten a decent role this time. I'm tired of seeing him made to play a stereotype.
Posted by: Nikki@jamaicansayings | November 08, 2012 at 05:25 PM
What do you know, David Ehrenstein and Rex Reed are in agreement on this movie. Ha. I jest. Most of the critics seem to like the film. Looking forward to it - fake beards and all.
Posted by: MDL | November 09, 2012 at 12:26 PM
I'd say Dinesh D'Souza's ass is sore enough already (metaphorically speaking).
Posted by: Oliver_C | November 10, 2012 at 08:51 AM
"It's all about how slavery was repealed -- with African-Americans occasionally allowed to slide into the dark-mottled-with-patches-of-light compositions (pretentious and tiresome in the extreme -- as if it were a crime to fully light a shot) Slavery may be over along with Jim Crow but clearly Speilberg got these players from "Rent-a-Negro" as they are nothing more than cardboard."
I still liked the film, but I think Ehrenstein brought up a valid point. The African-Americans in "Lincoln" are not much more than context, and they certainly don't feel as realized as other supporting figures in the picture. You can't single out "Lincoln" - this is a common problem with a lot of historical depictions of this nature. Spielberg's other films have been subject to similar complaints, but you see this all the time elsewhere, even in documentaries.
Posted by: J. Priest | November 10, 2012 at 03:26 PM
Ehrenstein offers very little film criticism here other than stating the African-American characters are cardboard. He then uses a HIGHLY RACIST comment about where the Berg got them from.
Weak.
Out-smarting the film by listing artistic choices you clearly would not have made(e.g. lighting) is not quite acceptable film criticism now is it?
I clicked on your review hoping for some film criticism but what did I find? A bunch of YouTube clips from other Lincoln films sprinkled with a few sentences.
Seriously?
Don't you have to critically asses WHAT IS ON THE SCREEN and not what YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE MOVIE?
Posted by: kdringg | November 12, 2012 at 03:26 PM
Re: the use of African-American characters, the NY Times just published an op-ed that delves more into the issue:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/opinion/in-spielbergs-lincoln-passive-black-characters.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&hp&pagewanted=all
Posted by: J. Priest | November 13, 2012 at 11:34 PM
I'm just an ANGRY NEGRO kdringg
And that ain't the half of it -- now that Tony Kushner has weighed in
http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2012/11/15/abraham-lincoln-shirt-lifter/
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | November 15, 2012 at 05:32 PM
Did anyone else think that the lighting, composition, color palette, etc. were reminiscent of 19th century American paintings? Specifically, I was thinking along the lines of Thomas Eakins and Emanuel Leutze. My knowledge of 19th century American painting is rather slim, so please feel free to correct me. Thanks!
Posted by: Thomas Prieto | November 16, 2012 at 05:38 AM