« "The Haunting" (Robert Wise, 1963) | Main | One of the good ones »

October 04, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

David Ehrenstein

In the final analysis this is a movie about Lee Daniels wanting to film Zac Ephron in his underpants.

Had he honestly set out to make a softcore gay porn movie I could have some degree of respect for him (at an Andy Milligan level). But what we have here is pure sensationalism of the sort that makes "Cannibal Holocaust" look like a work of moral integrity.

Why does Zac Ephron suddenly rush into the ocean?

So he can get stung by jellyfish.

And what are those jellyfish doing there all of a sudden?

Stinging him so Nicole Kidman can pee on him.

This film has nothing seriously to do with racism or anything else.
A close friend of mine is quasi-friend of Lee Daniels. His reaction to the film? "Well it's just Lee being Lee."


When did Nicole Kidman turn into Pamela Anderson?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Tip Jar

Tip Jar
Blog powered by Typepad