Another bombshell I missed over the weekend: the revelation of an unusual affinity I have with, yup, Nikki FInke. On Saturday she averred that David Cronenberg's "enigmatic adaptation of J.G. Ballard's Crash" is one of her "favorite motion pictures."
Wow. I would say that makes two of us, but every now and then I'm happy to learn that there's another soul out there, and another, and another, who refers to the Cronenberg film as "the real Crash." I remember when it first came out, I did an interview with Cronenberg for Premiere that largely focused on how thoroughly hated/misunderstood the picture was, turning off even some of the director's most loyal followers.
The revelation is interesting for a number of reasons, not least of which is that given how FInke gives the impression that she pretty much hates everything, it's always bracing to find out what she likes. The fact that this admission is placed at the head of what's essentially an advertisement for herself makes it even more delicious. BTW, the woman above is Deborah Kara Unger, in the film's very disarming opening scene. Just so you know.
I've never been a fan of this particular Cronenberg film, but I will say right out that, yes, it is "the real CRASH", light-years beyond the Oscar winner in terms of acting, of directing, depth of feeling and of intellect, and of overall effect. It's not an experience I'd particularly relish going through again, but I'd certainly rather watch it than suffer through the Haggis a second time.
Posted by: Tom Russell | October 13, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Actually, I'm in the habit of referring to Cronenberg's film as the ONLY "Crash."
Posted by: Zach | October 13, 2009 at 03:05 PM
You mean there's another CRASH? I've heard Cronenberg never forgave Haggis for stealing that title for his film... urban legend?
Posted by: Tony Dayoub | October 13, 2009 at 03:23 PM
I've never seen Haggis's "Crash," and I walked out of Cronenberg's (right at the car-wash scene, as I recall) and have never seen the ending. The problem for me was that because it was a studio film, or because the cast wouldn't do it, or because Cronenberg himself wasn't willing to go all the way, the movie was a half-measure. Anybody willing to direct an adaptation of Crash must be willing to make a porn movie with car crashes, and Cronenberg was either unwilling or unable to go full-on. I have thought for years that it should be re-attempted - my choice for director would be Michael Ninn.
Posted by: twitter.com/pdfreeman | October 13, 2009 at 04:14 PM
I actually love "Crash", which has the distinction of also being the best Ballard adaptation. Not that that's a thick field of competition in the first place, alas. What I wouldn't give to see a Gaspar Noe "High Rise" or "Super-Cannes", or an Aronofsky "Crystal World".
@Tony
From what I understand, he was upset about the title grab, but inordinately amused by the sudden bump in home video sales and rentals of said film.
Posted by: Dan | October 13, 2009 at 04:17 PM
This is one of my absolute favorite Cronenberg films too!
Phil Freeman, your comment reminds me of what Cronenberg said about a faithful adaptation of Naked Lunch: that to do it properly would require a budget of $200 million, and it would then be banned by every country on Earth.
Posted by: Jeff McMahon | October 13, 2009 at 06:50 PM
I liked the movie a lot, although as I was walking out I said I didn't want to see it again and I haven't.
More important: where's my James Spader screen grab, huh? He was more beautiful than Unger at that point in his career. What happened to Unger anyway?
Posted by: The Siren | October 13, 2009 at 08:35 PM
I loved the book but was never a fan of the film. It's hard to get past the images and the general mood I got from the book. The movie seemed so much slooooweeeeerrrrr too. But, yeah, I realize no one should really try to make a faithful adaptation. And even then it's all about interpretation anyway.
Posted by: MattL | October 13, 2009 at 11:02 PM
@ TheSiren: She is still working, White Noise, Silent Hill, 88 Minutes. Perhaps she needs a new agent though...
Posted by: Account Deleted | October 14, 2009 at 04:19 AM
Crash was a film that will always have a special place in my heart. I believe we all have special movie experiences that stand out from the rest, if not due to the film's quality so much as the circumstances. I watched Crash when I was about 12 years old, at midnight, having very sneakily snuck downstairs while my parents were asleep. I had rented it incognito, as I was forced to by my wonderful parents who were working in the they understood-I-loved-film-but-wouldn't-feel-comfortable-knowing-they-allowed-
me-to-watch-such-filth mode. It was midnight exactly, a dark still night, around Christmas time. The film starts and I immediately feel on edge, worried at every sound, 'Was that the house settling or a concerned parent wondering what's going on downstairs?' But soon I was into the slick cool wound of the film. I still always think of Elias Koteas' monologue before the James Dean re-enactment, how he draped and pulled himself over the car. And of course the leg wound, which would be the first topic of conversation at school the next day in the you'll-never-believe-what-I-fucking-saw mode. I remember thinking at the time that this was a mature Cronenberg film. I have no idea where the hell I picked that up, being I was only 12 and couldn't really throw my cinema-weight around in the slightest. I think it was because I was a fan of The Fly and that film, as remembered by a young boy, is all goopy, for lack of a better word. Gorey and weird but still you could follow it. Crash was its own world, its own deal, and weird and shocking as it may be it had something at the center of it that felt true. I still don't know what it was.
Posted by: John | October 14, 2009 at 08:12 AM
When Crash comes out on (region-free) blu-ray, that's the day I'll know I was right to invest in a player.
Just finished reading Ballard's wonderful autobiography, Miracles of Life. Interesting to learn that Vaughn (the 'hoodlum scientist' from Crash) was based on this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Evans_%28computer_scientist%29
Evans was a good friend of Ballard's, so it was pretty gutsy for the (as far as I know) uncomplicatedly heterosexual writer to put his alter ego into an explicitly gay sex scene with Vaughn...
Posted by: Paul | October 14, 2009 at 09:26 AM
There is another film version of Crash (sort of), made in 1971 and starring Ballard himself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5tpVcnfJrY
Posted by: LondonLee | October 14, 2009 at 10:35 AM
I just love when Roseanna Arquette started taking herself apart. What a hot piece of tuna.
Posted by: trooper york | October 14, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Oh sorry. Can you talk like that here?
Posted by: trooper york | October 14, 2009 at 02:09 PM
@ Trooper: You CAN (I'm a free-expression absolutist up to a point) but it might not earn you a whole lot of pals right off the bat.
Posted by: Glenn Kenny | October 14, 2009 at 02:35 PM
That's ok. I have enough friends.
Glad to hear you are an absolutist just like me.
Great blog you have here.
Posted by: trooper york | October 14, 2009 at 03:06 PM
Plus every village needs an idiot.
Is the position filled?
Posted by: trooper york | October 14, 2009 at 03:08 PM
She actually mentioned her affection for the Cronenberg film prior to that in the comments of one of my one one of my blog posts that got just a little contentious.
http://www.premiumhollywood.com/2009/10/07/think-finke/#comment-510864
Posted by: Bob Westal | October 15, 2009 at 04:20 AM
I feel terrible for laughing at that Rosanna Arquette comment.
The scene where she and James Spader go "car shopping" is one of my all-time favorites from Cronenberg.
Posted by: Joe Bowman | October 15, 2009 at 05:46 AM
I still remember when the posters for "the other one" went up in the subway. My first thought---really, not kidding at all here, was "Hunh, they're doing a remake of Crash? That seems a little soon, but maybe someone thought it could be more commercial with Matt Dillon and Thadie Newton in the Spader/Hunter parts. Weird."
Posted by: Fuzzy Bastard | October 15, 2009 at 08:33 AM
Someone should go through the novel and count how many times Ballard uses the word "junction". A lot, I think would be the total.
Posted by: bill | October 15, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Also, I find it pretty hilarious that the DVD of CRASH includes both the NC-17 and R-Rated cuts. Who is the R-Rated cut for, exactly? For people who find a film about people who are sexually aroused by car crashes completely fascinating, but can't handle all the sex?
Posted by: bill | October 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Bill> Ask and you shall receive. Here's a link to a concordance cross-referencing every word in Ballard's oeuvre.
http://www.mikebonsall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/concordance/framconc.htm
Junction: 22. Junctions: 10.
Ain't the internet great?
Posted by: Paul | October 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Holy shit.
Posted by: bill | October 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM
bill: "Who is the R-Rated cut for, exactly? For people who find a film about people who are sexually aroused by car crashes completely fascinating, but can't handle all the sex?"
As I recall, it was a contractual obligation for video release, and Cronenberg accepted the challenge just to see if he could come up with a redacted version that made any sense. And was rather pleased that he couldn't.
Posted by: Bruce Reid | October 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Well. Both my questions have been answered. Thanks, fellahs!
Posted by: bill | October 15, 2009 at 01:39 PM
You know, I read the book having never read Ballard before to prepare for the movie, and loved it, but never got around to seeing the film.
Deborah Unger is one of those special weird kind of actresses who can make their death scene look sorta kinda hot.
Posted by: Dan Coyle | October 15, 2009 at 03:36 PM