James Villiers, John Fraser, and Hugh Futcher as "John," "Colin," and "Reggie."
Colin, center, is the over-eager drip in oblivious pursuit of Carol. Completely clueless about, or perhaps merely crassly indifferent to, her deteriorating mental state, his idea of turning on the charm is to say things like "You really make me feel wanted." Clearly, his time would be better spent auditioning for The Dave Clark Five. Colin's mates, John and Reggie, don't have any interaction with Carol (lucky for her...and them), but are full of manly encouragement and advice for their pal. "Still keeping her lags crossed?" John enquires of the young woman he refers to as "Little Miss Muffet." The above pub commiseration reaches a climax of sort when John recommends that Colin invite Carol over to Reggie's place so the three of them can gang-rape her. Nice. As for Colin, he continues his petulant puling until Carol, shall we say, makes it stop. You'll be horrified, but strangely relieved.
Patrick Wymark as "The Landlord"
As much as Carol may not have it together, sister Helen's a bit of a fuck-up too, neglecting to pay the rent for an unspecified period and then rolling her eyes and complaining that their landlord only ever thinks of money after he calls looking for it. That's what landlords do, honey. Helen pulls it together and hands the rent money to Carol before going off on holiday with the charming Michael, but Carol gets a...little preoccupied, and forgets to walk it over. So, soon enough, the landlord comes to pay a visit.
He's not impressed with what Carol's done with the place in her sister's absence. There's the wooden board she's nailed to the front door in an effort to discourage visitors, for one thing. "You're damaging the property," he notes. And then there's that rabbit. "It's like a pigsty," he says, understandably appalled. And for all that he still comes on to Carol anyway! Men really are something.
And, finally, there's "Daddy." But revealing him would be a bit of a spoiler, actually.
Colin was definitely the one that killed me (so to speak). Clueless is part of his thing, manipulative is another, but half-clueless in his manipulation, as if he's doing and saying all the stuff he's been told to say to make her go for him, so why isn't she going for him? Guyyyy! So perfect a specimen of the fella-hood of the time that he barely seems to be acting.
Posted by: Allen Belz | July 15, 2009 at 03:18 PM
Forgot to add that there does seem to be an undercurrent of actual humanity in him...that's interested in Carol, would honestly like to know more about her, and would even like to perhaps slough off his horrible buddies. But it's so hopelessly enmeshed in all the societal messages and pressures its actions and desires emerge on the surface all fucked-up.
Posted by: Allen Belz | July 15, 2009 at 03:26 PM
That's true, Allen. But he's also objectified her so thoroughly that he takes her genuine mental disturbance for hard-to-get coyness.
Posted by: Glenn Kenny | July 15, 2009 at 03:35 PM
Agreed, definitely...a product of those aforementioned messages and pressures. In ten years time he may've "progressed" to the "Women...such mysterious creatures" stage of objectivification.
Posted by: Allen Belz | July 15, 2009 at 03:58 PM
Glenn: So you think (SPOILER) that her father abused or raped her as a child? And that this is the root of her mental breakdown? Because that's what I thought, too, but couldn't find 'proof' anywhere...in German literature, at least. They just noted her 'empty stare' even as a girl.
Posted by: Fabian W. | July 15, 2009 at 07:11 PM
@ F.W.: Let's say I consider that a reasonable surmise...
Posted by: Genn Kenny | July 15, 2009 at 07:16 PM
@ Glenn: What else, right? They were probably just busy trying to find a reason to write about the Manson murders instead of the actual movie.
Posted by: Fabian W. | July 15, 2009 at 07:45 PM
I actually think Rosemary's Baby has a great deal to say about the infantilization of women during pregnancy. When I was pregnant the last time, I was startled to find that it was the one movie that really GOT pregnancy and was willing to confront all the things that women hardly even admit to themselves--the fears that beset you, the feeling of being out of control, the way everybody pats you on the head and tells you it will be all right, the way you monitor every little physical manifestation. I was expecting you to name that one and not Tess, truth be told.
Repulsion, when I saw it, struck me as a not-terribly-interesting take on women's sexuality. WAIT -- before you boot me off the blog forever, let me say that you've convinced me I need to see it again and pay more attention to the male characters.
Posted by: Campaspe | July 15, 2009 at 09:02 PM
Come to think of it, this movie also makes an interesting pendant to the one being discussed just below ...
Posted by: Campaspe | July 15, 2009 at 09:29 PM
People tend to get sidetracked by Polanski's personal life when viewing his female characters. They throw the misogyny label around without really articulating what they mean. It's really nice to read an actual critique of his films from a somewhat feminist perspective. So, thank you! Polanski is my favorite filmmaker and I've always found his female characters, especially the central figures like Carole, Tess, Rosemary, and Paulina, to be authentic martyrs and/or survivors to their separate situations. Polanski puts all of his characters through hell, but his female characters are almost specifically created to show exactly what you said: "how a patriarchal society can crush women." I'm looking forward to buying Repulsion on blu-ray as soon as I can.
Posted by: Sara | July 15, 2009 at 09:57 PM
@ Sara: Thanks, it's nice to know I'm not groping in the dark on this.
@ Campaspe: You'll have to try harder to get booted off this blog! I'm kicking myself for not including the great "Rosemary's Baby" in my consideration of Polanski's women, and I do look forward to learning of what you make of "Repulsion" when you revisit it. This thread has got me thinking that I ought to look into the power dynamics of "Knife In The Water" again...This is, when you get right down to it, one of the more fascinating topics in late-20th-century cinema!..
Posted by: Glenn Kenny | July 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Ah, Polanski, the anti-Ford (much as James Cameron is the anti-Ozu). Claustrophobia, intimate betrayal, people doing the right thing and so not getting rewarded for it: you could say that "The Pianist" is his most generous version of community. After all, it's not Warsaw that's making Adrien Brody's life miserable. It's the fact that the city is being systematically obliterated throughout the movie that's his problem. And at the end, a whole concert hall full of Poles applauds him! Anyway, it's nice to know that someone likes "Tess." It's one of my favorite movies, though apparently no-one else's.
Posted by: partisan | July 16, 2009 at 02:12 AM
As I recall, KITW was filled with plenty of thematic juice as well. Might have to rewatch that one again myself.
Posted by: Allen Belz | July 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM
OK, dammit, due to the price of the Blu-Ray being identical to the DVD and seeing that the prices of players are reaching reasonable levels I'm...yes, I'm making the switch. Of course it won't make that much difference at the moment as my TV's the same old one I've had for 10 or so years, but...
Posted by: Allen Belz | July 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM