« Anti-American Pie |
| Weird »
Posted at 12:08 PM in Then and Now | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5523026f588340115715947ef970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Then and now #5:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I sit and watch...
...As Tears Go By
Arthur S. |
June 25, 2009 at 02:11 PM
In his autobiography, Captain Beefheart's guitar player Zoot Horn Rollo reminisces about meeting Marianne Faithfull at a party back in the day. He says something like "I saw Marianne Faithfull there and she was gorgeous. She had a long thread of drool coming out one side of her mouth, but she was gorgeous."
I've seen some video of Marianne's recent live performances and she's at the top of her game as a performing artist. I think her album BEFORE THE POISON, with songs she co-wrote with Nick Cave and PJ Harvey, leaves BROKEN ENGLISH in the dust.
Tim Lucas |
June 25, 2009 at 02:50 PM
Completely unrelated to this, who says Premiere doesn't still offer insightful critique?
John M |
June 25, 2009 at 03:40 PM
$60 million opening day...
Anyways, more on topic, I wonder why Criterion isn't giving the new Godard releases (Made In USA and Two Or Three Things...) the Blu-ray treatment. How do they decide what qualifies? Does a film have to be singled out for its visual greatness?
June 25, 2009 at 07:42 PM
God, I loved that movie when I saw the re-release a few months ago. What was Donald Westlake's problem? Surely this adaptation, however loose (and I assume it was so loose as to have no real connection to the source material) couldn't have been more offensive than every other Westlake adaptation, Point Blank excepted. Anyway, it was a real treat to see it in the theater here in LA.
June 25, 2009 at 09:44 PM
@JC: I sure wish that Criterion would put EVERYTHING they've got on Blu-ray, but there are myriad economic, not to mention licensing, concerns that necessarily inform all their decisions in that realm. Both films look absolutely killer in their SD editions, particularly if played on an upconverting player.
@Joel: I don't know that Westlake had a problem with the film per se so much as he had a problem with getting, as he and his attorneys saw it, ripped off. Godard's film is, after all, a very cursory adaptation of "The Jugger." As it happens, Westlake was making himself available for interviews on the film just prior to its Film Forum revival, and I was going to schedule one, but the man died before he spoke to any press about the picture,
Glenn Kenny |
June 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM
As a future lawyer, I understand why he objected to Made in USA. Too bad you couldn't interview him. He's one of my favorite comic novelists, and I've always thought that there's a great trove of un-filmed Westlake on the bookstore shelves, starting with God Save the Mark.
June 26, 2009 at 10:09 PM
She is gorgeous, but IRINA PALM is one of the worst European movies released in the last ten years. And that's saying something.
Lord Henry |
June 27, 2009 at 10:31 AM
@ Lord Henry: I ought to have explicitly stated that in the context of "Then and Now," a screen cap is by no means to be taken as an implicit endorsement of the film itself. Because "Palm" is indeed pretty bad, and ridiculous.
Glenn Kenny |
June 27, 2009 at 10:52 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.